Homeless
Emergency
Budget
Recommendations
2018-2019
City of Santa Rosa
ContextDespite various attempts to help and some mild success, the homeless emergency continues to exist in Santa Rosa.
· We have a
shortage of critical shelter beds. Officially, more than half of our homeless residents (769)
sleep outside every night and, county-wide, nearly 2/3rds have no
shelter.
·
Five
large encampments and countless small ones have been cleared without any
appreciable improvement in the number of people housed or any lessoning of the
suffering of Santa Rosa’s homeless people.
·
Last
winter’s emergency shelter at the Armory cared for approximately 90 people a
night, but there is no winter shelter planned for Santa Rosa this year.
There is
good news. The national affordable
housing shortage and continuing numbers of homeless individuals has brought
attention and some additional money to bear. California, in particular, is providing new money for the
temporary, non-standard shelter we are advocating, and they are looking for
creative solutions. With the help
of city staff and non-profit partners, we anticipate bringing some of that
money to Santa Rosa in order to provide higher quality emergency “stability
first” shelter for many of the 769 people currently left out in the cold. In addition we recommend a variety
of policy changes to address this emergency.
We
propose targeting $1.8 million in funding for immediate emergency shelter
needs, using a variety of new initiatives and funding sources. We recommend that $310,000 be allocated in
the city budget for this purpose. We’re
looking to both the city and county to provide matching funds for these
projects in the coming year. With
help from city and county staff members in an ongoing planning process, we can significantly
augment your contribution with other sources, some of which are discussed below.
Financial Recommendations
Project
|
Number Served
|
Approx. Cost
|
Year-round
“security first” shelter either in surplus buildings or on vacant land
|
100
|
$170,000
|
Year-round Safe
Parking
|
70
|
$50,000
|
Winter Shelter
Oct-March
|
90
|
$50,000
|
Housing First
Facilitator
|
30
|
$40,000
|
Total
|
290
|
$310,000
|
In
addition, we support a budgetary set aside of approximately $1.2 million for
one or more permanent supportive housing projects.
Description: With the creation of the new senior
center on Steele Lane, most of the senior services at Bennett Valley are
scheduled to end. This building
could be repurposed to provide single room occupancy housing for approximately
70 homeless seniors on the model of the Palms Inn. Some of the current classes could continue in a remodeled
facility and remain open to the neighborhood seniors. This project should be able to access
some of the state funding detailed below. If this building cannot be used, this money will be available
for other opportunities.
Policy Recommendations
·
Before the Winter Rain. Use
an expedited timeline to get the projects with the least infrastructure and
construction sited and ready for use in the next three months.
·
Open Private Land. Adopt new incentives for
private property owners to partner with homeless housing developers to use
empty sites for temporary and supported housing until construction begins.
·
Open The Process. In awarding this
money, even for the smaller project, use an RFP process in order to begin
building capacity among our diverse homeless service provider community.
·
Open Public Land. Identify and provide
funding to prepare all surplus public property for the development of
permanent, supported housing in a variety of housing designs and capacities.
·
Getting In the System.
Ensure that all homeless facilities and services comply with Housing
First entry guidelines, expanding the available short-term beds.
·
Getting Housed. Hire a “Housing First”
Facilitator who is available for both sheltered and unsheltered homeless
people. Oblige all future projects by housing developers that are
partly funded by the city or required by inclusionary zoning to include a
percentage of extremely low income housing. Expand the Santa Rosa Housing Authority priority for housing
homeless people.
·
Best Advice from Everyone.
Establish an ongoing advisory group to provide guidance to the City on
homeless services and facilities, bringing together providers, city staff,
homeless individuals, and the community.
Expanded Descriptions
These policy and
financial suggestions support a continuum of solutions including independent
and supportive shelters, transitional villages, single-room occupancy hotels,
master-leased apartments, and newly-constructed and subsidized low income
housing projects.
Year-round “security first”
shelter either in buildings or on vacant land:
From long experience, service providers, Homeless Action!, and independent volunteers are well aware of the required essentials and costs of making these approaches work. Proposals will be grounded in a growing body of literature on best practices and successful projects. Whether called transitional villages, safe spaces, sanctioned encampments or something else, these options utilize existing structures within the homeless community’s current camps. They add enough support and oversight to bring safety to the residents and comfort to the neighborhood. Security first villages work best with roughly 30 people per site. To keep the costs reasonable, we recommend an individualized staffing plan for each site, depending on client mix and other factors. This option combined with some winter shelter beds can eliminate much of the instability, illness, and death experienced by the Last Chance villagers. Volunteers can assist with initial challenges and support at all sites.
From long experience, service providers, Homeless Action!, and independent volunteers are well aware of the required essentials and costs of making these approaches work. Proposals will be grounded in a growing body of literature on best practices and successful projects. Whether called transitional villages, safe spaces, sanctioned encampments or something else, these options utilize existing structures within the homeless community’s current camps. They add enough support and oversight to bring safety to the residents and comfort to the neighborhood. Security first villages work best with roughly 30 people per site. To keep the costs reasonable, we recommend an individualized staffing plan for each site, depending on client mix and other factors. This option combined with some winter shelter beds can eliminate much of the instability, illness, and death experienced by the Last Chance villagers. Volunteers can assist with initial challenges and support at all sites.
Year-round Safe
Parking. This cost, potentially administered
from an expanded CHAP program, covers the sanitation and stipend for an on-site
volunteer manager. Homeless
Action! has operated a successful Safe Parking site at McBride Avenue for over
a year and we understand the necessary components. The Bennett Valley Senior Center with its 60 person
parking lot is an obvious potential site for some Safe Parking slots. Other city-owned sites can be located.
Winter Shelter
Oct-March. The $100,000 expense is based on the
work of St. Vincent De Paul at the Armory in 2016-2018. The Armory is expensive, unavailable on
weekends and people have to leave early in the dark, cold mornings. We recommend a search for a better
facility.
Housing First
Facilitator. One full-time job similar to the Housing
Navigators currently hired by Catholic Charities. This worker would work in the wider community.
State & Local Matching Money
These state monies are more likely
to come to Santa Rosa if the city already has money available for shelter
and/or housing projects. Because
of the state-wide housing shortage and homeless emergency, these state-wide
funds are likely to be highly competitive.
1) California’s 2018-2019 budget includes one-time money of $500
million to address homelessness.
Details have not been released yet. To get a share of this funding Santa Rosa will need a
developer who is ready, willing and able to pursue a viable project.
2) "No Place Like
Home", funding for supportive housing for people affected by mental
illnesses. Likely to be available
early next year, although a court case about the legality of diverting service
money to housing is being deliberated.
We may also see a ballot measure on the November ballot to allow this.
The initiative specifically targets cheap, innovative solutions,
including transitional villages.
3) If the State housing bond
is successful in November, $1.5 billion will go into MHP (Multifamily
Housing Program). There will be a priority and/or set aside for projects
that include a supportive housing component.
4) We will also see funding coming from the "permanent
source" approved last year. It is likely to provide about $400 million
annually. This is not specifically targeted for supportive housing or
other homeless-designated housing, but it can be used for those purposes.
5) Homeless Action! supports a Santa Rosa bond measure for the
November ballot.
6) Any successful award from one or more of these sources,
including any city funding, will increase the likelihood of a project receiving
an allocation of tax credits, the largest subsidy for low income rental housing.
No comments:
Post a Comment