Voices on Homelessness

Sunday, January 8, 2017

StreetTeam - Homeless Working

Greetings!

Click on the link below to learn about a program that Homeless Action is looking into. Its currently being implemented in several Northbay cities: StreetTeam.

Saturday, January 7, 2017

History and current conditions in housing development in Santa Rosa - Jan 2017

Since 2011 LHMP Year Residential ,Non-residential

2013 - 488 permits issued

 121 single family dwellings
 359 multifamily dwellings
 7 second dwelling units
 1 mobile home

Located:

 39 in northeast Santa Rosa
 139 in southeast Santa Rosa
 8 in southwest Santa Rosa
 302 in northwest Santa Rosa

239,465 square feet of new construction permitted, including:

 144,388 square foot Target store in Coddingtown
 14,450 square foot parts storage and service bay to Volkswagen and Subaru
 8,600 square foot Firestone store on Santa Rosa Avenue
 4,000 square foot market and gas station on Farmers Lane

2014 - 252 permits issued

 183 single family dwellings
 64 multifamily dwellings
 5 second dwelling units

Located:

 28 in northeast Santa Rosa
 96 in southeast Santa Rosa
 73 in southwest Santa Rosa
 55 in northwest Santa Rosa

151,311 square feet of new construction permitted, including:

87, 800 square foot storage facility on Sonoma Highway
 Dick’s Sporting Goods store in Coddingtown
 Fiat dealership on Santa Rosa Avenue

2015 - 126 permits issued

 93 single family dwellings
 26 multifamily dwellings
 7 second dwelling units

Located:

 23 in northeast Santa Rosa
 56 in southeast Santa Rosa
 47 in northwest Santa Rosa

 Nordstrom Rack store in Coddingtown
 Senior Care Facility, Vineyard at Fountaingrove
 Museum of the Square renovation
 Industrial Building on Square Court

2016- 2017 Building Permits
Permit Number Land Use Size Status
Catalina SFR-Attached 60 units - Under construction
Duke Court Lot #6 General Industrial 16,390 sq ft - Under construction
Nordstrom Rack Retail 31,000 sq ft - Under construction
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen Restaurant 2,695 sq ft - Application under review
Range Ranch Multi-family 270 units - Recently completed
Range Ranch II Multi-family 120 units - Application under review
Rock Star University Light Industrial 10,025 sq ft - Under construction
SR Sports & Entertainment Recreational 128,000 sq ft - Under construction
Southern Gardens SFRDetached 14 units - Under construction
Tapestry SFRDetached 34 units - Under construction
The Meadows at Oakmont SFRDetached 36 units - Recently completed
Wilibees of Sonoma Retail 6,500 sq ft - Recently completed

2017+ Engineering Permits
Permit Number Land Use Size Status
Bay Village Development SFR-Attached 12 units - Final Map under review
Calistoga Village SFRDetached 17 units - Grading permit issued
CarMax Auto retail - Grading permit issued
Fox Hollow Subdivision SFRDetached 143 units - Under review
Francisco Village SFRDetached 77 units - Under review
Kawana Meadows Subdivision SFRDetached/ Duplex lots 124 units - Grading permit issued
Kylie Lane Subdivision SFRDetached 12 units - Grading permit issued
North Street Apartments Multi-family 20 units - Under review
Pantoja Lane Subdivision SFRDetached 16 units - Under review
Prospect Oaks Subdivision SFR-Attached 32 units - Grading permit issued
Pullman Lofts Multi-family 72 units - Approved
Ravello Subdivision SFRDetached 13 units - Under review
Sandalwood SFRDetached/ Multi-family 16 units/ 2 units - Grading permit issued
Skyfarm 3 SFRDetached 30 units - Under review

2017+ Planning Permits
Permit Number Land Use Size Status
Airway Community Care Community care 90 units - Application under review
Canyon Oaks Multi-family 96 units - Application under review
Smith Village/ Pantoja Lane SFRDetached/ Second units 67 units/ 9 units - Approved
Spring Lake Village East Grove Multi-family 24 units - Application under review
Stony Village North SFRDetached 40 units - Application under review
Stony Village South SFRDetached 115 units - Application under review
Terrazzo at Fountaingrove SFRDetached 19 units - Application under review
The Shops at Austin Creek Retail 43,206 sq ft - Application under review

Saturday, December 24, 2016

Death and Access: Homeless Outcome Data I'd Like Reported

These questions, and others, are important evaluations of program performance of the entire system of care for homeless in Sonoma County. While some of the answers are contained in current databases used by programs, a more comprehensive review needs to be instituted for advance planning.

How many die on our streets and woods?
How many die in our shelters?
How many die in our transitional housing who were previously housed in shelters?
How many die in permanent housing who were previously housed in transitional housing and shelters?
How long have those in our shelters lived on the streets?
How many times have our shelter residents entered and exited our shelters? Entered and exited other shelters?
How long are people staying in our shelters?
For those with more than one stay in our shelters, where did they live between stays?
Did they enroll in transitional housing?
Did they obtain any governmental services or benefits as a result of their stay at the shelter?
What services do those who stay at our shelters find most valuable to obtaining more permanent housing?
How long have those in our transitional housing lived in shelters or the streets?
How many times have our transitional housing residents entered and exited our transitional housing or shelters? Entered and exited other transitional housing?
How long are people staying in our transitional housing?
For those with more than one stay in our transitional housing, where did they live between stays?
Did they obtain permanent housing?
Did they obtain any governmental services or benefits as a result of their stay at our transitional housing?
What services do those who stay at our transitional housing find most valuable to obtaining more permanent housing?
How long have those in our permanent housing lived in permanent housing, transitional housing, shelters or the streets?
How many times have our permanent housing residents entered and exited our permanent housing, transitional housing or shelters? Entered and exited other permanent housing or transitional housing?
How long are people staying in our permanent or transitional housing?
For those with more than one stay in our permanent housing, where did they live between stays?
Did they obtain other permanent housing?
Did they obtain any governmental services or benefits as a result of their stay at our permanent housing?
What services do those who stay at our permanent housing find most valuable?

Stepping Out of Homelessness: Clear and Accessible Pathways to Housing

Greetings!

I know all of you have been supportive of building a system of housing and supportive services which addresses the needs of our community. And over the past five decades, we have enacted, administered, and fought to improve and retain many excellent components of that system. And I applaud the more recent initiatives by local and state governments to respond to the accelerating housing crisis. Our representatives have heard from a unified citizenry that all are effected, and are pursuing solutions like gifts under a Christmas tree.

But more than ever before, what is needed is a stronger coordination of programs to insure that they facilitate clear and accessible pathways to permanent housing for all.

If we agree that a general acceleration of housing development at all levels is an essential component of the solution, and we believe that the housing mobility that results will contribute to those pathways, we must do everything we can to link and coordinate access at each level of housing.

To insure that those living on the street or woods can access shelters, we funded shelters with the expectation that they will be available to them.

To insure that those in shelters can access transitional housing, we funded shared-housing placement programs, rental deposit and security funds, and short-term rental units with the expectation that they would be available to them.

To insure that those in shared transitional housing can access stable, individual permanent housing, we built and rehabilitated housing stock with long-term low income access requirements, and established government rental subsidies to attract an even larger pool of available housing.

And those social service agencies working with the occupants of this housing stock assisted them in understanding the many, and often confusing, rules governing eligibility and access. And supported them to utilize personal services which addressed many additional needs.

As a result of an unprecedented emergency housing crisis, we are now embarking on both the addition of new housing alternatives between the street and subsidized permanent housing (safe camping and parking, encampments, tiny homes, accessory units, etc), and the modification and augmentation of a level above government-subsidized rental units - affordable housing beyond in-lieu-funded, nonprofit-built housing. Santa Rosa’s Affordable Housing Incentive Pilot Project and Sonoma County’s Community Development Commission initiatives to partner with local developers are good examples.

In order to insure that those who continue to utilize our housing continuum can truly achieve their goals of self-sufficiency, we need to improve and expand our access coordination for them throughout all levels. A greater sharing and coordination of participants, coupled with coordinated policies for priority eligibility of those in the system to these new levels we are supporting would be good steps to those goals.

Currently, the successful outcomes we report from our homeless support efforts are the number of homeless engaged by our teams who receive health and housing screenings; among those permanently housed, the increase in the number who have a primary health care provider; and the number of emergency room visits and ambulance trips utilized by homeless.

That data, while evidence of the impact on government program use, is not difficult to obtain, and requires little coordination or bridging of silos. But it doesn’t measure how well we directly assist all homeless to obtain improved housing. In our efforts to assist homeless at every level of need, we need to better understand how well our system supports upward mobility now. Let's track and utilize the impact of our housing resources on successful transitions of our users through all levels of our housing resources, from the streets to permanent housing?

This shouldn’t be that difficult to accomplish. By sharing resident occupancy data and supported improved housing applications, we can build a valuable housing outcome information system. This information is crucial to the operational improvement of each program, is necessary for effective system policy development and overall funding decisions, and is essential to creating a barrier-free system with the goal of housing for all.

Conversation with Jennielynn Holmes, Catholic Charities Homeless Program Director

Greetings!

This afternoon, over hot chocolate at Holy Roast, I talked with Jennielynn Holmes. She asked for the meeting, but I was as eager as she was, to see if we could come up with good ideas on how to expand communication on the topic of homelessness in Santa Rosa.

The first question she asked was whether she was right in feeling some tension between Homeless Action and Catholic Charities, and between the homeless community and the Homeless Collective. I said both were true, for the same reason - lack of communication. Recognizing that everyone was meeting separately on Monday mornings, we agreed that every effort had to be explored to overcome this barrier.

One of our ideas was the publication of a monthly newsletter, providing her an opportunity to update the community on improvements and challenges. Another was to adjust meeting times to better accommodate participation in multiple meetings. We agreed to encourage the Homeless Collective to ensure that significant operational changes, and suggested City Council recommendations, be shared publicly before adoption.